Study breakdown4 min read
SURMOUNT-5 explained: tirzepatide vs semaglutide head to head
The first head-to-head obesity trial of tirzepatide and semaglutide found a 20.2% vs 13.7% weight loss gap at 72 weeks. What it tested, what it did not, and what it means for access.
By the PeptideAgent Editorial Team. Draft, pending editorial review. Last verified
The short answer: SURMOUNT-5 is the first randomized trial to put tirzepatide and semaglutide head to head for obesity, and tirzepatide won on the primary endpoint by about 6.5 percentage points of body weight at 72 weeks. [1] It answers the "which one loses more weight" question for people without diabetes. It does not answer questions about heart outcomes, long-term safety, or which drug a given person should use.
This breakdown covers what the study shows. It does not give dosing advice.
The design
SURMOUNT-5 was a phase 3b, open-label trial. Adults with obesity but without type 2 diabetes were randomized 1:1 to the maximum tolerated dose of weekly tirzepatide (10 mg or 15 mg) or weekly semaglutide (1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 72 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change in body weight. Key secondary endpoints were the share of people reaching at least 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% weight loss, and the change in waist circumference. [1]
Two design choices shape how to read it. First, each arm used the maximum tolerated dose, so people who could not tolerate the top dose stayed on a lower one. That mirrors real prescribing, and it means the trial compares two treatment strategies rather than two fixed doses. Second, everyone enrolled was free of type 2 diabetes, so the result speaks most directly to people seeking treatment for obesity alone. [1]
The results
751 participants were randomized. [1]
| Outcome | Tirzepatide | Semaglutide |
|---|---|---|
| Mean weight change | −20.2% | −13.7% |
| Mean waist change | −18.4 cm | −13.0 cm |
Both differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.001), and people on tirzepatide were more likely to reach each of the 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% weight loss thresholds. [1]
The most common adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal, mostly mild to moderate and mostly during dose escalation. [1]
How it fits with earlier trials
The result lines up with what the placebo-controlled trials suggested. In SURMOUNT-1, tirzepatide at 15 mg produced a mean weight change of minus 20.9% at 72 weeks versus minus 3.1% on placebo. [3] In STEP 1, semaglutide 2.4 mg produced minus 14.9% at 68 weeks versus minus 2.4%. [4] SURMOUNT-5 confirms that gap directly, in one population, under one protocol.
It also echoes SURPASS-2, the earlier head-to-head trial in type 2 diabetes. There tirzepatide at 5, 10, and 15 mg lowered HbA1c and body weight more than semaglutide 1 mg, with weight change of minus 7.6 to minus 11.2 kg versus minus 5.7 kg. [2] Note that SURPASS-2 used the diabetes dose of semaglutide, lower than the obesity dose tested in SURMOUNT-5.
Our semaglutide vs tirzepatide comparison lays out both trials alongside mechanism, labels, and regulatory status.
What the trial does not tell you
Four limits matter when you read the headline number.
- Open label. Everyone knew which drug they were on. Weight is an objective measure, which limits the bias, but behavior and dropout can still differ when people know their assignment. [1]
- Sponsor. The trial was funded by the manufacturer of tirzepatide. [1] That does not make the result wrong, and the trial was registered and published in a major journal, but independent replication would strengthen it.
- No hard outcomes. SURMOUNT-5 measured weight and waist size. Semaglutide has a completed cardiovascular outcomes trial in obesity without diabetes: in SELECT, it lowered the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 20% versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.80). [5] Wegovy carries that cardiovascular indication on its label, and the tablet form does too. [7]
- Averages, not individuals. Some people on semaglutide lose more than some people on tirzepatide. Tolerability, other conditions, and coverage often decide the choice in practice.
Label differences worth knowing
Both labels carry a boxed warning about thyroid C-cell tumors seen in rodents. [6] [7] Their approved uses differ. Zepbound is approved for weight reduction in adults and for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults with obesity. [6] Wegovy injection is approved for weight reduction in adults and adolescents aged 12 and older, cardiovascular risk reduction, and noncirrhotic MASH with moderate to advanced fibrosis. [7] Those indications can decide what an insurer will cover.
What it means for access
For most people the practical question is not which drug wins a trial but which one they can get. Coverage often follows the indication on the prescription, and the tirzepatide cost page and semaglutide cost page break out list, self-pay, insurance, and telehealth prices. For Medicare Part D enrollees who qualify, the Medicare GLP-1 Bridge covers Wegovy (injection or tablet) and the Zepbound KwikPen at a 50 USD monthly copay from July 1, 2026, with prior authorization. [8]
The obesity condition page grades every option we track, and the GLP-1 hub collects every drug in the class with its regulatory status.
Decisions about starting, stopping, or combining any treatment belong with a licensed clinician who knows your history.
Pages referenced in this article
- PeptideTirzepatide
- PeptideSemaglutide
- ComparisonSemaglutide vs tirzepatide
- CostTirzepatide cost
- CostSemaglutide cost
- ConditionObesity and chronic weight management
Frequently asked questions
What did SURMOUNT-5 find?
In 751 adults with obesity and no type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide produced a mean weight change of minus 20.2% at 72 weeks versus minus 13.7% with semaglutide, and a larger reduction in waist circumference (minus 18.4 cm versus minus 13.0 cm). [1]
Was SURMOUNT-5 blinded?
No. It was a phase 3b open-label trial, so participants and investigators knew which drug was given. It was funded by the maker of tirzepatide. [1]
Does SURMOUNT-5 mean tirzepatide is better for heart health?
No. SURMOUNT-5 measured weight and waist circumference, not heart attacks or strokes. Semaglutide has a completed cardiovascular outcomes trial in people with obesity, SELECT, which found a 20% lower risk of major cardiovascular events versus placebo. [1] [5]
Were side effects different between the two drugs?
The published abstract reports that gastrointestinal events were the most common in both groups, mostly mild to moderate and concentrated during dose escalation. [1]
Sources
Numbered citations in the article point to these primary sources. PubMed entries link to the indexed abstract. Evidence grades follow our methodology.
- [1]Aronne LJ et al. Tirzepatide as compared with semaglutide for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med 2025 (SURMOUNT-5)PubMed 40353578, 2025
- [2]Frias JP et al. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021 (SURPASS-2)PubMed 34170647, 2021
- [3]Jastreboff AM et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med 2022 (SURMOUNT-1)PubMed 35658024, 2022
- [4]Wilding JPH et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med 2021 (STEP 1)PubMed 33567185, 2021
- [5]Lincoff AM et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes. N Engl J Med 2023 (SELECT)PubMed 37952131, 2023
- [6]FDA prescribing information for Zepbound (tirzepatide) injection, revised August 2026, via DailyMedFDA
- [7]FDA prescribing information for Wegovy (semaglutide) injection and tablets, revised June 2026, via DailyMedFDA
- [8]Medicare.gov: weight loss drugs, Medicare GLP-1 Bridge coverage, eligibility, and 50 USD copay, accessed 2026-09-22